Talk:Wikipedia errors
Rabies[edit]
Looks okay to me, as they use different shades of green. Light green for Ireland as it's only officially free since 1904, and France had a case back in 2004 (free since 1990 or after) - Alison ❤ 01:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- http://www.nelm.nhs.uk/en/NeLM-Area/News/494427/494638/494654/
- Plus you can't believe them. Rabies free is possible on an island but in a place like France with all those long borders not so much. Auggie 13:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
More[edit]
- Wikipedia is a tyranny.
- Wikipedia is run by administrators who hate everyone on the site and wish that Alcatraz would be used again to imprison who they deem as vandals, disruptive, or sockpuppets.
- Jimbo, Larry and the WMF are the most ignorant people in the world. They never listen to anyone.
- The people who get to run Wikipedia are jerks who never listen to anyone, they just treat people based on their history and wish that those people were never born.
- Wikipedia's restricting system is a breeding grounds for suicide and plans to do illegal things to the WMF place.
- Floquenbeam and his goons are practically the Adolf Hitler of Germany in 1933.
- Wikipedia always breaks their promises and does not do what they say they do and they often contradict itself.
- Wikipedia will never survive to 2050. Soon, the economic collapsing will be so bad that Wikipedia will HAVE to be shut down due to budget cuts, with something more similar to Wikipedia than Infogalactic replacing it.
- Every attempt to create utopian societies fails. Democracy and socialism have been exploited, and both of them are now associated with tyranny.
- White men have an unfair advantage over black women because there is a white, male majority of people contributing to this site who are exploiting consensus to make their opinions matter more than the black, female minority.
- Consensus and democracy and socialism will not guarantee a utopian society, no matter how many positive things you say about your society, misery can still come out of such overtly optimistic attempts.
- Encyc is a good alternative. Infogalactic is also a good alternative if I want to feel like I'm editing Wikipedia. Illogicopedia is where I can go crazy.
Oops, forgot to sign. --Turkeybutt JC (talk) 16:45, 28 October 2016 (CDT) Unfortunately, Infogalactic would rather people ask for accounts via email rather than just let users create accounts right off the bat. Who in their own right mind would use email for that stuff? --Turkeybutt JC (talk) 17:09, 28 October 2016 (CDT) Infogalactic won't even let account-less users talk until they are in the Phase Four of the donation thing. --Turkeybutt JC (talk) 17:17, 28 October 2016 (CDT)