Sex-abuse hysteria case
The term sex-abuse hysteria case is applied to legal cases that fit a pattern where individuals faced accusations of sex crimes so shocking it affected the critical judgement of law enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges, and members of juries.[1] In the cases that fit this pattern individuals who were convicted, and were sentenced, subsequently had their convictions overturned, leaving observers wondering how the flimsy and contradictory evidence against them ever convicted them.
Experts have compared the cases that fit this pattern to witch trials like the Salem witch trials.[1] Experts have cataloged 60 exonerations in cases that fit this pattern.
References
[edit | edit source]- ↑ 1.0 1.1
Shaila Dewan (2026-08-25). "She Was Absolved of a Heinous Crime. Why Won't They Leave Her Alone?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2026-08-25.
Her supposed crime, sexually abusing preschoolers at a Head Start nursery, was part of a wave of outlandish day care abuse allegations in the 1980s and ’90s. Widely known today as the sex-abuse hysteria cases, they followed roughly the same arc as the Salem witch trials, beginning with hasty convictions and ending in recrimination over how so many prosecutions could have been based on so little evidence. The cases have resulted in more than 60 exonerations across 13 states.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "c942" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "davispolk-NancySmith-2022-03-29" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
<ref> tag with name "davispolk" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.