Abilene paradox

From Encyc

The Abilene paradox is a paradox in which the limits of a particular situation force a group of people to act in a way that is directly the opposite of their actual preferences. It is a phenomenon that occurs when groups continue with misguided activities which no group member desires because no member is willing to raise objections. It was observed by management expert Jerry B. Harvey in his article The Abilene Paradox and other Meditations on Management.[1] The name of the phenomenon comes from an anecdote in the article which Harvey uses to elucidate the paradox:

The phenomenon may be a form of groupthink. It is easily explained by social psychology theories of social conformity and social cognition which suggest that human beings often feel great disincentives to acting in a manner contrary to the trend of the group. Likewise, it can be observed in psychology that indirect cues and hidden motives often lie behind peoples' statements and acts, frequently because social disincentives may exist which preclude individuals from openly voicing their feelings or pursuing their desires.

This anecdote was also made into a short film for management education. The theory is often used to help explain extremely poor business decisions, especially notions of the superiority of "rule by committee." A technique mentioned in the study and/or training of management, as well as practical guidance by consultants, is that group members, when the time comes for a group to make decisions, should ask each other, "Are we going to Abilene?" to determine whether their decision is legitimately desired by the group's members or merely a result of this kind of groupthink.

The "Abilene Paradox" remains related to the concept of "groupthink," in that both theories appear to explain the observed behavior of groups in social contexts. The crux of the theory is that groups have just as many problems managing their agreements as they do their disagreements. This unique and innovative observation rings true among many researchers in the field of Social sciences, and tends to reinforce other theories of individual and group behavior.

Researchers in this field have proposed various means by which groups can avoid such dysfunctional behaviors. None have proven more effective than the inclusion of people with diverse backgrounds in the decision-making process. Groups so comprised tend to be more effective in avoiding "Abilene Paradox" situations, and tend to be able to make much better decisions overall.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Harvey, Jerry B. (1974). "The Abilene Paradox and other Meditations on Management". Organizational Dynamics. 3 (1). Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  • Harvey, Jerry B. (1988). The Abilene Paradox and Other Meditations on Management. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
  • Harvey, Jerry B. (1999). How Come Every Time I Get Stabbed In The Back, My Fingerprints Are on The Knife?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

es:Paradoja de Abilene fi:Abilenen paradoksi