Talk:Silvia Lovato
Add topicComment
[edit source]In this edit User:Sandsonthehorizen nominated the page Silvia Lovato for deletion because: "I couldn’t find any public info or photos mentioning freckles specifically for Silvia Lovato.".
Okay, isn't this like "Prove the sky is blue"? Every single photo of Ms Lovato shows she is heavily freckled. The way I see it, User:Sandsonthehorizen, yours seems to be a concern over what Wikipedia calls DUE WEIGHT, and does not merit an immediate jump to deletion. I suggest future concerns, like this one, should be politely discussed on the article's talk page. Can we reserve deletion for serious concerns?
(Note: Some photos, found by Google, don't show heavily freckled individuals, because Ms Lovato has namesakes.)
Ping @Enki
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:54, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fqlwj7g7lni851.jpg She's isn't just any woman. She's rare beauty. --The Seer 17:36, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- I been fighting with The Seer aka LeicesterLass aka Dove Hepburn for awhile now they always get support from Enki why is this? Sandsonthehorizen (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
freckles
[edit source]User:Sandsonthehorizen nominated the page Silvia Lovato for deletion because: "I couldn’t find any public info or photos mentioning freckles specifically for Silvia Lovato.".
I challenged the seriousness of this deletion rationale. Sands, did you want to offer a more substantive justification? The current article would not meet CSD#A7. Wikipedia adopted a rule, some time ago, that any BLP that did not have at least one good reference could be {{prod}}ded. But I do not think encyc has a corresponding rule.
You aren't arguing the article is an attack page, are you?
We are all volunteers here. You don't have to offer a more substantive deletion rationale. But if you don't do you think the rest of us should assume your concerns are satisfied, and the deletion tag should be removed?